|
A Tale of Stone and Wood
“Simplicity underlies finest taste”
Auguste Rodin
|
The worldly wisdom of the great French
sculptor Auguste Rodin most accurately fits the architectural expression of
the self-made construction genius of the modest Kovachevitsa masons. Simplicity
elevated to perfection in the architecture assembly as a whole and its magnificent
details is the most noteworthy merit of the unique style of the Kovachevitsa
Construction Architecture School. It would be difficult to find elsewhere such
an impeccable architecture synthesis between natural environment and building
miracle created by human hand. We would only be grateful today for the existence
of this tale of stone and wood in which the complete splendor of local spirit,
diligence and talent of the Renaissance Kovachevitsa are entwined.
Viewed from a historical perspective the architecture aspects of the village
prior to the arrival of the emigrants from the Debar, Kichevo and Tetovo Regions
in 1791 were almost wiped out. The new professional interventions is so strong
such as to acquire gradually almost all architecture spaces in order to leave
our modernity a masterpiece of a unique accord of styles!
|
The Debar
builders that in several generations turned into Kovachevitsa ones appreciated
natural beauty and therefore not only did they not impair it, but further skillfully
integrated their creations into the limited unity with nature. Today we cannot
miss expressing our admiration for the approach and mode of situating and constructing
the houses, the building of ancillary economic premises, commercial, public
ones, etc. and the link in between, the unique stone arteries – the alleys compliant
with natural resources: a scarce, steep, and rocky terrain.
Some facts of the past that provoke curiosity and amazement also today in view
of the unique construction of the public utilities in the village evidence the
building talent and foresight: for instance the pipeline, which was based on
a modern technology at that time dug into the rocky alley terrain at depth of
2.5 m!
The unique alley pavements with a drainage denivelation of the rain water with
included cross thresholds of stone plates that prevented from happening sliding
on the extremely steep terrain in the winter could also be deemed as construction
models.
|
The eaves
of the houses clustered in between at many points that cast a deep shadow on the
cobblestone pavements and brought a nice sense of coziness in hot summer times,
were also fine shelters against snow drifts in times of harsher winters. These
picturesquely mazy narrow village alley without sidewalks were one of the most
attractive relaxation places especially next to one of the 12 fountains that filled
with life and poetry the ancient architecture. The house walls solidly standing
right on the alley pavement does not bother the eye, as their forms were softened,
the sharp edges were rounded by the caring hand of the builder such as to ensure
comfortable and save movement of people, carts and stock. |
The notion
of saving the construction space led to extremely rational architecture solutions
that impress with its logic and completeness. Each of the Kovachevitsa houses
in itself was a unique architecture solution of the general task: to achieve
maximum residential space with minimum means. Therefore, the common feature
of the houses is the development of the built-up area on the vertical axis as
the space in the basis is the tightest and the most limited and the expansion
unveils in elevation. Timber used by the craftsmen in the lower register of
the houses at scattered places only in the form of koshak (reinforcement) in
the solid two-folding entrance doors and some small service windows, created
a general impression of the houses of being stone Middle Age fortresses. They
resembled defense towers standing on guard in the midst of the village raised
right from the rocky landscape and reaching high with 3-4 floor size structures.
Naturally, the latter notion was brief until the eyes reached the upper floors
where the gifted builder demonstrated extravagance using timber.
Along the stretch of the houses two- or three-floored one of top of the other
the ceilings were made of timber. The visible main structures of the roofs made
of 10-15 m planks that impressed even the most critical eye with its master
processing, added the new feeling of warmth provoked by the noble color of timber.
|
The abundance
of timber of the finest quality in the vicinity gave several centuries the liberty
of the craftsmen to create the unique interior of the Kovachevitsa house. The
timber-made couches, the embedded furniture, book shelves, closets, columns
and anything else required by the home customs and coziness passed through the
hands and the hearts of the original craftsmen from Tetovo, Kostur and Debar
characterized by proverbial expression simplicity and beauty. Extreme ornateness
and eclectics typical for Renaissance houses in other regions of the country
were not present here. No object existed unless having a functional purpose.
Simply what was useful became beautiful as well. Harsh life and living of people
for centuries were reflected in the modest, simple interior architecture even
in the residential premises number, type and functionality. The famous Kovachevitsa
houses referred to as “fraternal” reflected the philosophy of input labor and
equal relations in the family and lineal patriarchal life. In the assembly of
two to three houses none of them dominated. They situated on the terrain such
as to avoid hindering one another, competing, robbing one another of the space
and light. Such an interaction of volumes in the architecture composition reached
in the fraternal complexes did not have an analogue in the records of the Bulgarian
Renaissance architecture thought.
It would not be hard to imagine the understanding among people and the participation
of the entire working population in the process of building each new house.
The latter was the main reason for the synchrony reached between the mixture
of complicated “Ô-shaped or “Ï”-shaped rows and groups of houses that formed
the compact carpet-like building of the village. Once again the main reason
for the rich and extremely functional building was the lack of terrain. Scarce
and steep, the latter imposed the differentiation of the residential environment
in Kovachevitsa into three zones: residential center zone, a layer of agricultural
premises (for weeding, granaries, etc.), and outside the latter also a zone
of agricultural areas. That structure of the village was preserved for a long
time since it was the most natural and successful solution for adequate existence
of the population.
|
The Kovachevitsa
houses similar to the Rodopi houses in general were solid stone-made buildings
with peculiar masterfully executed masonry. The building technology was quite
simple: mozaically arranged non-hewed stones cemented with soft soil. The solid
masonry was extremely firm and its duration has been verified by time, and the
beauty of the overflowing ochre to a cold gray stone mosaic was indisputable.
The thin patina-covered-over-time reinforcement (koshatzi) separating the stone
masonry into horizontal layers introduced a human dimension and a decoration
response of the austere stone areas. The Kovachevitsa masons left also their
unique construction mark on the timber frame of the top structures, the windows,
the doors, the timber oriel paneling and naturally on the simple and laconic
architecture detail of the interior. Entering into the traditional Kovachevitsa
house, a prototype of the Rodopi one, one should first pass through the “dry”
yard next to which the podnik (cattle-shed) was situated in the lowest register
of the building. If an economic floor were present, usually developed at a semi-level,
one could reach it using a large timber step-ladder. The following one or tow
floors were designed to accommodate the crowded families. In the initial type
of construction that lasted until the 17th century the large families inhabited
a big room with a fireplace that functioned both as a bedroom and a living room.
In the 19th century the structure of the family houses underwent a significant
change after the separation of separate families in individual rooms with fireplaces.
The interior was enriched by building specialized premises that noted the advanced
everyday manners of the Kovachevitsa community. The most popular interior structures
were as follows: “ceiling — ponton” (salon – hall way) with an adjunct step-ladder
thereto fully made of timber via which a link could be made with all other premises;
vodnik (water storage for daily necessities); kyoshk – resting room; independent
rooms with fireplaces and ovens sometimes linked with the ceiling. The ceiling
remains the most interesting interior element even from a modern point of view.
Always directed to the best view, the latter defined also the visual and space
solution of the main fa?ade of the house, as it integrated very strikingly in
the assembly type of the fraternal houses. Various architecture schemes of the
situation of the ceiling: longitudinal, cross, symmetrical, and central-transverse
determines the differences in the facades of the Kovachevitsa house.
The talented craftsmen did not stop importing variety into each new house as
they exported further one-sided, two-sided or threesided balconies with wide
eaves. They also enriched the architecture and construction elements with peculiar
details on the parapets, and the wooden wall-curtains of the eaves. The moderate
use of the socalled joiner’s fretwork on ceilings, doors, garrets, and column
ends, visible from the outside was in full harmony with the austere style of
the interior.
|
The flexible
dynamics of the oriels exported above the stone facades of the Daskalov House,
the Sarafov House, the Bangov House, the Urdev House, etc. exemplified the early
Renaissance Rodopi architecture. The assemblies of the Dishlyanov House, the
Shumarev House, the Pilarev House, the Gyuzelev House, the Kyupov House as well
as the large group of the Shimerov Houses had a unique impact and architecture
and artistic virtues. All of the latter as well as the other Kovachevitsa houses
owed their stylistic completeness to the stone top made of a beautiful mosaic
of the famous tiles, riolyte plates, each one with a different shape obtained
by manual processing and having natural patina. The Kovachevitsa would not have
been harmoniously complete architecturally without that authentic architecture
feature.
The significant construction achievements of the Kovachevitsa masons indisputably
originated from the expertise passed on as a family tradition, but also in the
customary legal norms observed by everyone that regulated the relations in the
league in view of hierarchy, arrangements, labor distribution, and profit allocation.
The gradual introduction of hired labor under the waged-based form in the mason
groups at the end of the 19th century was a prerequisite for a new statute and
hierarchy in the construction guild. It is known to me that in Kovachevitsa
a Management Board used to be selected of the most prominent masters that presented
the image of the mason profession in society. Shops for specialized instruments
were opened and competition rendered the craftsmen create a secret language
of theirs referred to as “meshtrovsky” or “meshtrogansky” of the type of social
dialects close to the Bratzigovo one and fully incomprehensible to the uneducated
ones, as more than 300 meshtrogansky words and phrases have been preserved.
|
Only memories
passed on by word from one generation to the next have remained from the tremendous
construction times of Kovachevitsa. One could hear a word or two even today about
the large Vris bazaar in the center and the twenty shops located there from the
Shubalekov fountain to the Landjov one, named after local families, about the
smithy, the packsaddle’s shop, the forge, the shoemaker’s shop, the tailor’s shop,
the confectionary, and the grocery. They still exist in the memories of the few
local residents. Some of them used to run as kids on the Vris bazaar and used
to enjoy the unique big market on which villagers and merchants of the neighboring
villages used to come to offer their various goods. In the 50s of the last century
the new road built to the Beslet Forestry put an end to the diversity and tumult
because it passed right in the middle of the bazaar destroying all commercial
buildings. The unique inn (the Bakalov House) that had used to be in the very
center of the bazaar was also demolished. Fortunately, not all public sites were
damaged. The public-spirited community of Kovachevitsa saved the most precious
monument of effort of the entire community, it used to be a symbol of hope of
better life, confidence, and protection of suffering. Therefore, they dedicated
it to St. Nikola, a guardian of the strangers, workers, and refuges as the entire
community originated there of. |
The story
of the permit obtained hard from the Turkish Authorities to build the church
turned into a local legend tells for a famous Kovachevitsa merchant that managed
to receive recognition even in the Sultan’s Court in Tzarigrad as being a skillful
barber. His fellowvillagers asked him for assistance since it had been impossible
for them to receive a construction permit from the Sultan Administration (the
High Gate). The latter was done by Sultan himself who issued and signed a firman
for the construction of the Kovachevitsa church as a sign of benevolence and
recognition of the Kovachevitsa barber’s talent. The only condition was that
it should not be raised tall in order not to been seen from a large distance.
Therefore, the builders dug the church into the ground and yet preserved its
large size in the interior. The entire community worked to build this God’s
temple and maybe that is the reason why the craftsmen forgot to engrave their
names in a commemorative tablet on the wall or probably the sponsors were that
numerous and it was difficult to fit onto one wall. The church was completed
and sanctified in 1848. The St. Nikola basilica with a nave a two aisles, one
of the five largest basilicas in Bulgaria, was built following the traditional
Kovachevitsa technique and materials, solid stone walls and top, covered by
stone tiles tikli. The windows were laid high in the sub-ceiling structure and
provided fine lighting in the interior of the church.
A vast three-row iconostasis fully made of wood with an extremely beautiful
royal entrance welcomes the worshippers with its awesome magnificence. The sacral
mysticism of the church is reinforced more than 70 icons arranged in three horizontal
rows.
|
The twenty
royal icons of the middle of the 19th century were created by an anonymous icon-painter
that bore the marks of the late icon-painters of the Tryavna Painting School.
The colors, the composition solutions and the painting technique were undoubted
executed by a fine brush master the created unique images of the late Renaissance
icon-painting. The apostolic and celebration row of icons in the iconostasis was
made by other anonymous icon-painters. On the Northern and Southern walls close
to the iconostasis were placed arcs of two extremely precious icons: St. George
and a Horse and St. Dimitar and a Horse created by the hand of Georgi Stregyov
in 1874 of the Balkan Artistic School. |
The church
complex was fully completed as late as 1900 when the Kovachevitsa people gained
courage and money to raise without an official permit a 12-m tall bell tower in
the church yard. In the latter four-floor tower they placed 2 large bells cast
by Goren Brod craftsmen as a donation by the Alexov brothers. On the eastern side
of the tower also the first clock was installed that measured time by the beat
of the clock hammer on the bells. Thus the ring sound with its melodic sound accompanied
Kovachevitsa people on every hour in their hard days and spread a rich tune of
the two bells on holydays. Unfortunately the clock did not survive to our times.
The buildings of the St. Nikola Church, the Cell School and the Elementary School
“Yordje Dimitrov” linked in a unique architecture complex as well as many of the
old village houses have a status of Architecture Culture Monuments in compliance
with the provisions of the Law of Culture Monuments and Museums. |
print | back
|
|